Cardinal sins when implementing 360 Degree Feedback

We are often asked the best way to implement 360 Feedback within an organisation, which is a little like asking what is the best flavour ice cream. It depends!! What we can say with some degree of certainty however is what generally does not work so well. So in this newsletter I thought that I would o ffer our guide as to "How to pretty much be guaranteed to get 360 Feedback implementation wrong" or as we say "How to SCROD it"

  • Starting in the middle
  • Chinese Whispers
  • Read this its good for you
  • Only a questionnaire
  • Diving In

As with most things in life not all 360 Feedback suppliers are born equal, and it may be to your benefit to consider which of these issues are important to your company before rather than after choosing the best route for you.

Starting in the middle

Boards and senior management often feel that they are above improving, and that this type of thing is really only for the lower ranks. They start in the middle because it is too expensive to start at the bottom.

The idea that there will be any credibility for a process where there is a limit on accountability is flawed before it starts, and will almost certainly lead to implicit if not explicit rejection and subversion of the process.

Chinese Whispers

Time and again companies start 360's without understanding the number of people that will be touched by it within an organisation. Staff find that they have been "invited" to provide confidential feedback on colleagues without any idea of the context.

If there is no formal and rigorous process to communicate the context and rationale, then people will inevitably form their own conclusions, and these conclusions will travel faster and more effectively than any corporate medium.

There are generally two ways to get the report wrong;

1) Ignoring the concerns of the individual

Very few people receive their 360 feedback report without some sense of trepidation. Many companies compound this issue by forcing them to review the report in the first instance with either their manager or a member of the HR staff, without giving the individual the time and resources to consider carefully the content and any learning that they might wish to draw from it.

2) Creating reports that are unreadable

The desire to offer as much information as possible to the individual can be extremely counterproductive, particularly if the data is presented at a level of numeracy that the individual is not comfortable with. In addition to this the logic of the report should also be considered carefully.

There is no joy in having to read 3 or 4 separate parts of a report to understand a single issue. We would argue that, particularly in the first instance, that the simpler a report the better it will be received, understood and acted upon. This does not mean that reports need to be short, only that the detail needs to be directly relevant and easily understandable.

Only a questionnaire

Personal feedback on other colleagues' performance is a serious matter that relatively few people embrace lightly. A standard questionnaire should normally take anywhere between 45minutes and an hour to complete. A standard project for say 10 people in a department will require that several members of staff may have to complete many questionnaires perhaps as many 6 or 8.

This is equivalent to a full days work, and the problem can be compounded if several departments are completing 360 processes at the same time. Companies often release 360 projects without any consideration for this fact. Basically asking already overstretched staff to find an extra working day at little notice within a two week or three week cycle. This is not conducive to good quality feedback, or engendering confidence in the process.

Diving In

Many companies start 360 systems because they have heard great things from colleagues, or quite simply that everyone is doing it. This is often without considering the context and impact within the culture of the company.

The 360 process is at its best when used a personal development tool, but if the resource or budget to invest in personal development is not available, or there is no obvious reward for growth from personal development then the process will flounder.

Join us at one of our free webinars

  • Topics of real interest to 360 Feedback users
  • Hear how 360 is being used in other companies
  • Learn the benefits and pitfalls from others' experiences
  • Interact and gain experience from other 360 users
  • Effective and enjoyable learning
  • Bite size chunks of time
  • No travel cost or time lost

We look forward to seeing you sometime soon - It won't be the same without you!

How secure & confidential is your 360 service?

Security and confidentiality in 360 Feedback systems are often either overlooked or considered in insufficient detail. This is completely understandable since most HR managers have a lot more pressing issues to consider than the relative merits of https over http protocols! However the implications of inadequately specifying the management of your company's data can range from the merely irritating to loss of confidence by staff and even litigation if data is lost or maltreated. The main areas that most companies need to consider include;

  • Staff personal privacy and consent
  • Protection of feedback confidentiality
  • System security versus accessibility
  • Data Protection Agency registration
  • Hardware back up, redundancy and resilience

As with most things in life not all 360 Feedback suppliers are born equal, and it may be to your benefit to consider which of these issues are important to your company before rather than after choosing the best route for you.

Privacy and Consent

  • Is there a data management statement clearly available?
  • Do you need to seek consent from each member of staff to participate?
  • Is there an opportunity required for staff to decline to take part?
  • Do you or your supplier hold any personal data about your staff (names and e-mail addresses included)?
  • Is your supplier registered with the Data Protection Agency?
  • Where is the supplier's statement as to their Data Protection commitment?

Confidentiality

  • Who decides who has access to feedback data?
  • What purpose is the data used for?
  • Is personal data encrypted?
  • Is the data available to anyone other than the provider and recipient of the feedback?
  • What mechanisms do you have in place to ensure that feedback is treated with respect and confidentiality?
  • How do you communicate these processes to your staff?

Access and Security

  • What security features are in place to protect the confidentiality of individual feedback?
  • How powerful do passwords/access protocols need to be and why?
  • Can users change passwords?
  • Is the feedback data kept on company computers, and who has access to them?
  • What security protocols are used to collect data?

IP Systems and Hardware

  • What back up procedures does the supplier have in place?
  • Is data back up in real time or in batch?
  • Where is the back up data physically located?
  • What happens when internet connection is lost?
  • How quickly can the system be available when there is loss of service?
  • What is the worst case data loss scenario?
  • Which elements of the internet connection use https protocols?